Prosthetic or Augment
Feb. 26th, 2025 09:04 amI just finished reading Mathematica: A Secret World of Intuition and Curiosity by David Bessis. You should read it. It has some great ideas about learning. It is a pretty quick read too.
I'm thinking more about thinking at the moment because of it. This morning, I thought about how AI can be used to help you with computer stuff you don't understand. However, I read a story recently that said that a lot of young programmers don't actually know how to program. They are over-reliant on AI. And it occurred to me that AI is a prosthetic. Don't have a skill or ability? Strap it on, and it can (more or less, depending on the quality of the AI) bring you up to an average level of competence. This works well for skills you don't want or need to develop. My interest in gardening is enough to want to plant stuff and watch it grow, but I'm not interested enough to go to university to study botany. I'll learn some by doing, but I'll never be an expert. Using AI also is great for people who lack something that they cannot acquire. Yesterday, I was freaking out, and I used the AI to hold my hand getting me through my day, as a kind of prosthetic functionality. When you get to skills that you want to learn, it can also be a prosthetic, for better or for worse. I use the AI to write emails in Portuguese. If I wanted to learn Portuguese faster, I would write the emails myself and then use the AI to correct it. However, at the moment, I am more interested in getting things done and saving my mental resources rather than learning faster. However, I have used the AI as a prosthetic teacher ("explain the difference between x and y") and as a prosthetic study partner ("let's practice speaking Portuguese together"). For skills you already know, it can be like a prosthetic assistant. Obviously, if you use a prosthetic in place of learning something yourself, you will never learn it. I think it is easier to understand why if you think about it in this way.
I'm thinking more about thinking at the moment because of it. This morning, I thought about how AI can be used to help you with computer stuff you don't understand. However, I read a story recently that said that a lot of young programmers don't actually know how to program. They are over-reliant on AI. And it occurred to me that AI is a prosthetic. Don't have a skill or ability? Strap it on, and it can (more or less, depending on the quality of the AI) bring you up to an average level of competence. This works well for skills you don't want or need to develop. My interest in gardening is enough to want to plant stuff and watch it grow, but I'm not interested enough to go to university to study botany. I'll learn some by doing, but I'll never be an expert. Using AI also is great for people who lack something that they cannot acquire. Yesterday, I was freaking out, and I used the AI to hold my hand getting me through my day, as a kind of prosthetic functionality. When you get to skills that you want to learn, it can also be a prosthetic, for better or for worse. I use the AI to write emails in Portuguese. If I wanted to learn Portuguese faster, I would write the emails myself and then use the AI to correct it. However, at the moment, I am more interested in getting things done and saving my mental resources rather than learning faster. However, I have used the AI as a prosthetic teacher ("explain the difference between x and y") and as a prosthetic study partner ("let's practice speaking Portuguese together"). For skills you already know, it can be like a prosthetic assistant. Obviously, if you use a prosthetic in place of learning something yourself, you will never learn it. I think it is easier to understand why if you think about it in this way.